Search found 11 matches
- Sun Feb 21, 2016 7:58 pm
- Forum: runmlwin user forum
- Topic: 2-level Poisson model - MQL1 works fine, PQL2 crashes
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5471
Re: 2-level Poisson model - MQL1 works fine, PQL2 crashes
A little push...
- Mon Feb 01, 2016 2:11 pm
- Forum: runmlwin user forum
- Topic: 2-level Poisson model - MQL1 works fine, PQL2 crashes
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5471
2-level Poisson model - MQL1 works fine, PQL2 crashes
[edit: Fixed the title. Cleaned up the Stata code.]
Hello,
I've been playing around with simulated 2-level count data. MQL1 estimates of the intercept and variance component were quite different from the true parameter values (xtmepoisson estimates were much better), so I suspected that was due ...
Hello,
I've been playing around with simulated 2-level count data. MQL1 estimates of the intercept and variance component were quite different from the true parameter values (xtmepoisson estimates were much better), so I suspected that was due ...
- Thu Mar 20, 2014 2:18 pm
- Forum: runmlwin user forum
- Topic: Confidence ellipse for EB estimates of bivariate random var
- Replies: 3
- Views: 6250
Re: Confidence ellipse for EB estimates of bivariate random
Hi George
Thank you very much. This is exactly what I was looking for. I'll check whether the results are similar to those based on MCMC but I cannot see why they wouldn't be. Thanks!
I assume with analytical formula you refer to Fieller's theorem? I am actually going to look into multivariate ...
Thank you very much. This is exactly what I was looking for. I'll check whether the results are similar to those based on MCMC but I cannot see why they wouldn't be. Thanks!
I assume with analytical formula you refer to Fieller's theorem? I am actually going to look into multivariate ...
- Fri Mar 07, 2014 2:33 pm
- Forum: runmlwin user forum
- Topic: Confidence ellipse for EB estimates of bivariate random var
- Replies: 3
- Views: 6250
Confidence ellipse for EB estimates of bivariate random var
Hello
I'm looking for ways to test a joint hypothesis about (or create a confidence ellipse around) the cluster-specific estimates of two random effects. I'm estimating a bivariate 2-lvl model and the error terms at each level are assumed to be drawn from a bivariate normal distribution with ...
I'm looking for ways to test a joint hypothesis about (or create a confidence ellipse around) the cluster-specific estimates of two random effects. I'm estimating a bivariate 2-lvl model and the error terms at each level are assumed to be drawn from a bivariate normal distribution with ...
- Thu Feb 06, 2014 3:20 pm
- Forum: MLwiN user forum
- Topic: Re-parametrization in multivariate models (MCMC)
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5154
Re: Re-parametrization in multivariate models (MCMC)
Hi Bill,
thank you for your very helpful response. Yes, I think I got tricked by the feedback that I received from runmlwin, saying that hierarchical centering is not an option here. I'll try centering at level 3 and will report back.
Thanks again
Nils
thank you for your very helpful response. Yes, I think I got tricked by the feedback that I received from runmlwin, saying that hierarchical centering is not an option here. I'll try centering at level 3 and will report back.
Thanks again
Nils
- Wed Feb 05, 2014 2:56 pm
- Forum: MLwiN user forum
- Topic: Re-parametrization in multivariate models (MCMC)
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5154
Re-parametrization in multivariate models (MCMC)
Hello
I'm struggling to estimate a multivariate (4 outcomes) multilevel (2 levels) model on approx 100,000 observations using MCMC. Correlation between outcomes is allowed through a MVN error distribution at first and second level. The ESS on the constant terms in each of the four models is very ...
I'm struggling to estimate a multivariate (4 outcomes) multilevel (2 levels) model on approx 100,000 observations using MCMC. Correlation between outcomes is allowed through a MVN error distribution at first and second level. The ESS on the constant terms in each of the four models is very ...
- Thu Jan 30, 2014 2:52 pm
- Forum: runmlwin user forum
- Topic: Very slow transition from burn-in to inference chain
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5119
Re: Very slow transition from burn-in to inference chain
Thanks Chris! Nothing to worry then - mixing is an issue but that's a problem of the model specification, not one that is due to MLwiN.
- Thu Jan 30, 2014 12:18 pm
- Forum: runmlwin user forum
- Topic: Very slow transition from burn-in to inference chain
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5119
Very slow transition from burn-in to inference chain
Hello,
as always, I'm not quite sure whether this is a runmlwin or MLwiN problem.
I'm estimating a complex (i.e. multivariate 2-lvl) model on a large sample (~100k obs) using MCMC via the runmlwin add-on. MLwiN 2.29 is run in batch mode using mlnscript.exe (64-bit). Estimation works, but ...
as always, I'm not quite sure whether this is a runmlwin or MLwiN problem.
I'm estimating a complex (i.e. multivariate 2-lvl) model on a large sample (~100k obs) using MCMC via the runmlwin add-on. MLwiN 2.29 is run in batch mode using mlnscript.exe (64-bit). Estimation works, but ...
- Tue Jan 07, 2014 10:27 am
- Forum: runmlwin user forum
- Topic: MCMC starting values
- Replies: 3
- Views: 8302
Re: MCMC starting values
Hello Chris,
thanks for your reply.
Well spotted! I hadn't noticed this behaviour before because I had only played around with values larger than 0.125. I now checked and it seems that the problem seems to be with the variance of the covariance term (V[4,4]). If this is chosen to be very small, the ...
thanks for your reply.
Well spotted! I hadn't noticed this behaviour before because I had only played around with values larger than 0.125. I now checked and it seems that the problem seems to be with the variance of the covariance term (V[4,4]). If this is chosen to be very small, the ...
- Tue Dec 10, 2013 2:26 pm
- Forum: runmlwin user forum
- Topic: MCMC starting values
- Replies: 3
- Views: 8302
MCMC starting values
Hello
(- sorry, not sure in which forum this fits best -)
I'm trying to estimate a multilevel mixed response model in MLwiN using MCMC and own starting values (all run through runmlwin). Unfortunately, MLwiN crashes every time. I use the example from the runmlwin help file to illustrate my problem ...
(- sorry, not sure in which forum this fits best -)
I'm trying to estimate a multilevel mixed response model in MLwiN using MCMC and own starting values (all run through runmlwin). Unfortunately, MLwiN crashes every time. I use the example from the runmlwin help file to illustrate my problem ...