Hi John,
With only 6 faculties you would be hard pressed to estimate random effects - I guess you may get enough departments to treat as random. If you decide to fit them as fixed effects then simply putting in department effects will saturate the model at that level and you will not be able to add ...
Search found 162 matches
- Mon Apr 17, 2023 4:40 pm
- Forum: MLwiN user forum
- Topic: Nested covariates and implication for ML model structure
- Replies: 2
- Views: 25775
- Thu Feb 02, 2023 10:17 am
- Forum: MLwiN user forum
- Topic: Multiple Membership Weights
- Replies: 2
- Views: 23312
Re: Multiple Membership Weights
Hi,
So there are various schools of thought here. Many people use weights that sum to 1 and I think in my MMMC paper (Browne, Goldstein and Rasbash, 2001) we did that. We have also argued (Tranmer, Steele and Browne, 2014) that it might make sense to make the squares of the weights sum to 1 as then ...
So there are various schools of thought here. Many people use weights that sum to 1 and I think in my MMMC paper (Browne, Goldstein and Rasbash, 2001) we did that. We have also argued (Tranmer, Steele and Browne, 2014) that it might make sense to make the squares of the weights sum to 1 as then ...
- Wed Oct 12, 2022 2:07 pm
- Forum: MLwiN user forum
- Topic: manage "time" in longitudinal dyadic MCMC model
- Replies: 2
- Views: 80321
Re: manage "time" in longitudinal dyadic MCMC model
Hi JeanSebastien,
This seems more of a concept question rather than an MLwiN question. I think if you give more information about your data then it might be easier to answer and I am assuming the question is related to the earlier one you sent.
Best wishes,
Bill.
This seems more of a concept question rather than an MLwiN question. I think if you give more information about your data then it might be easier to answer and I am assuming the question is related to the earlier one you sent.
Best wishes,
Bill.
- Wed Oct 12, 2022 2:05 pm
- Forum: MLwiN user forum
- Topic: Format dyadic data for MCMC model
- Replies: 1
- Views: 23477
Re: Format dyadic data for MCMC model
Hi JS,
You may need to give more details here as to what type of multilevel model you are fitting. Generally one would expect one row per response so it would depend on what level of data the responses were measured on - if this is dyads then you might have a multiple membership structure with ...
You may need to give more details here as to what type of multilevel model you are fitting. Generally one would expect one row per response so it would depend on what level of data the responses were measured on - if this is dyads then you might have a multiple membership structure with ...
- Tue Aug 09, 2022 12:38 pm
- Forum: MLwiN user forum
- Topic: repeated measurement multilevel modeling: research design
- Replies: 2
- Views: 20716
Re: repeated measurement multilevel modeling: research design
Hi Hakimeh,
Not sure I fully follow your research but I'll try and answer - your diagrams are a bit weird as I would have just put parent1, parent 2 etc. and then you would use whether they are addicted or not as a covariate - otherwise it looks like you only have 2 parents. I was unclear of what ...
Not sure I fully follow your research but I'll try and answer - your diagrams are a bit weird as I would have just put parent1, parent 2 etc. and then you would use whether they are addicted or not as a covariate - otherwise it looks like you only have 2 parents. I was unclear of what ...
- Mon Apr 25, 2022 11:28 am
- Forum: runmlwin user forum
- Topic: Cross-classified multilevel logit model: Deriving ICCs with varying group sizes
- Replies: 1
- Views: 57801
Re: Cross-classified multilevel logit model: Deriving ICCs with varying group sizes
Hi Johannes,
I am not sure that the group size differences will make much difference here - I guess you just have more information about within group variability in some groups than others. Your smallest group is still pretty big compared to many situations.
Best wishes,
Bill.
I am not sure that the group size differences will make much difference here - I guess you just have more information about within group variability in some groups than others. Your smallest group is still pretty big compared to many situations.
Best wishes,
Bill.
- Mon Nov 08, 2021 11:44 am
- Forum: MLwiN user forum
- Topic: Power Analysis: Rules of Thumb
- Replies: 1
- Views: 10993
Re: Power Analysis: Rules of Thumb
Hi Sabine,
That is really hard to say without knowing what you are hoping to test. Statistical power links to a test and will depend on what that test is and what effect size you are looking for / degree of clustering etc. There should be details in MLPowSim that will help.
Best wishes,
Bill.
That is really hard to say without knowing what you are hoping to test. Statistical power links to a test and will depend on what that test is and what effect size you are looking for / degree of clustering etc. There should be details in MLPowSim that will help.
Best wishes,
Bill.
- Fri Sep 17, 2021 7:57 am
- Forum: MLwiN user forum
- Topic: Inclusion of level-one variable increases group level variance in a multilevel negative binomial regression
- Replies: 4
- Views: 16141
Re: Inclusion of level-one variable increases group level variance in a multilevel negative binomial regression
Hi Liam,
If you register on the online LEMMA course there is stuff about this in unit 7 section 7.2 which is worth a read.
Best wishes,
Bill.
If you register on the online LEMMA course there is stuff about this in unit 7 section 7.2 which is worth a read.
Best wishes,
Bill.
- Wed Sep 01, 2021 1:17 pm
- Forum: MLwiN user forum
- Topic: Inclusion of level-one variable increases group level variance in a multilevel negative binomial regression
- Replies: 4
- Views: 16141
Re: Inclusion of level-one variable increases group level variance in a multilevel negative binomial regression
Hi Liam,
It is worth noting that for non-Normal multilevel models one has to be careful when interpreting higher level variance terms. The bottom level variance is always fixed by the distributional assumptions made and so when terms are added to the model that fixed variance would normally reduce ...
It is worth noting that for non-Normal multilevel models one has to be careful when interpreting higher level variance terms. The bottom level variance is always fixed by the distributional assumptions made and so when terms are added to the model that fixed variance would normally reduce ...
- Thu Jul 29, 2021 8:08 am
- Forum: MLwiN user forum
- Topic: Is it a repeated measurements multilevel modeling?
- Replies: 7
- Views: 21926
Re: Is it a repeated measurements multilevel modeling?
Hi Hakimeh,
The challenge you have is so much missing data. For any 1 place lets say that 2 people say it is beautiful and 1 picturesque out of 100 people. What you don't know is the opinions of the other 97 as you only ask them to choose 'an example' so they may all think the place in question is ...
The challenge you have is so much missing data. For any 1 place lets say that 2 people say it is beautiful and 1 picturesque out of 100 people. What you don't know is the opinions of the other 97 as you only ask them to choose 'an example' so they may all think the place in question is ...