Search found 1344 matches
- Thu Jan 06, 2022 12:49 pm
- Forum: MLwiN user forum
- Topic: Import imputation Start Analysis error
- Replies: 2
- Views: 13372
Re: Import imputation Start Analysis error
The number of cases reported here are for the initially loaded data, rather than each of the imputed datasets (which would all have complete data). This is because these are only loaded temporarily while the imputation analysis is being run, and the original data is restored once this is complete.
- Thu Jan 06, 2022 12:47 pm
- Forum: Realcom user forum
- Topic: Start Analysis error in MLwiN after retrieving REALCOM impute
- Replies: 4
- Views: 23824
Re: Start Analysis error in MLwiN after retrieving REALCOM impute
The "Cases in use" numbers reported in the equations window reflect the missing data in the currently loaded data. While the imputation analysis is run this is temporarily replaced with each of the imputed dataset from Realcom, however once the analysis is complete and the model results ar...
- Mon Dec 20, 2021 8:09 pm
- Forum: R2MLwiN user forum
- Topic: gelman-rubin
- Replies: 5
- Views: 6802
Re: gelman-rubin
You can find the MCMC chains in the chains slot of the mlwinfitMCMC object returned from the runMLwiN function. An example of this would be as follows: # for runMLwiN function library(R2MLwiN) # for gelman.diag function library(coda) # load the data data(tutorial, package = "R2MLwiN") # ru...
- Fri Nov 26, 2021 11:58 am
- Forum: runmlwin user forum
- Topic: Saving estimates from models (using MCMC) executed using runmlwin
- Replies: 4
- Views: 12600
Re: Saving estimates from models (using MCMC) executed using runmlwin
Unfortunately I don't think that there is currently a straightforward way to do this. If you look at lines 410 and 535 of ( mcmcsum.ado ) you will see that the results displayed for the summaries and detail option are stored returned in an r-class after the command is run, although as you say this i...
- Wed Nov 24, 2021 5:31 pm
- Forum: runmlwin user forum
- Topic: Saving estimates from models (using MCMC) executed using runmlwin
- Replies: 4
- Views: 12600
Re: Saving estimates from models (using MCMC) executed using runmlwin
It looks as if the estimates replay command does not carry across the display options set when running the command, however you can re-specify them when displaying the results, for example: . use http://www.bristol.ac.uk/cmm/media/runmlwin/bang, clear . logit use age, or Iteration 0: log likelihood ...
- Fri Nov 12, 2021 11:09 pm
- Forum: MLwiN user forum
- Topic: MLPowSim macro “analyse.txt” not working in MLWin
- Replies: 4
- Views: 11609
Re: MLPowSim macro “analyse.txt” not working in MLWin
The files that you provided ran successfully in both MLwiN versions 3.04 and 3.05 for me. You do not have to open a dataset prior to running the macro as all the values used are simulated. I set the current directory to the location of the macro files via Options>Directories, and opened the simu.txt...
- Sun Nov 07, 2021 8:59 pm
- Forum: MLwiN user forum
- Topic: MLPowSim macro “analyse.txt” not working in MLWin
- Replies: 4
- Views: 11609
Re: MLPowSim macro “analyse.txt” not working in MLWin
I am not sure where the dashes in that syntax are coming from. Would it be possible to post the generated script, and if possible the inputs you gave to MLPowSim to create it?
- Mon Nov 01, 2021 12:01 pm
- Forum: MLwiN user forum
- Topic: Problem with level 1 . variance
- Replies: 2
- Views: 6446
Re: Problem with level 1 . variance
If you are running a binary logit model then the variance is fixed at (π^2)/3 (≈3.29) rather than being an estimated parameter, and this is why you cannot add this to your model.
See the following FAQ for more information about variances: Partitioning variation across levels
See the following FAQ for more information about variances: Partitioning variation across levels
- Mon Nov 01, 2021 11:46 am
- Forum: runmlwin user forum
- Topic: Running margins on predictions from a runmlwin model fit
- Replies: 5
- Views: 8750
Re: Running margins on predictions from a runmlwin model fit
I showed this to George, but he wasn't able to say for sure. His advice was that unless the models ran too slowly or couldn't be fitted with mixed you should use that. If you can't do that then he suggests initially running a subsample or simplified version of your model using both mixed and your ma...
- Fri Oct 29, 2021 10:54 am
- Forum: R2MLwiN user forum
- Topic: Multi Level Modelling in R
- Replies: 1
- Views: 8338
Re: Multi Level Modelling in R
This forum is primarily for questions related to the "R2MLwiN" R package. You might get an answer if you ask about related packages, but there are often more appropriate places for these questions.