significance of random effects in cross-classified model

Welcome to the forum for runmlwin users. Feel free to post your question about runmlwin here. The Centre for Multilevel Modelling take no responsibility for the accuracy of these posts, we are unable to monitor them closely. Do go ahead and post your question and thank you in advance if you find the time to post any answers!

Go to runmlwin: Running MLwiN from within Stata >> http://www.bristol.ac.uk/cmm/software/runmlwin/
Post Reply
ginamartin
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 12:06 pm

significance of random effects in cross-classified model

Post by ginamartin »

Hello, I am running a 3 level logistic cross-classified model (neighbourhoods and schools) predicting a binary drinking outcome. I understand that it is best not to use the credibility intervals to determine significance of the random effects but the lrtest, for nested models. Does this apply to the cross-classified models? If so what is the comparison model? If not what is the best way to determine significance?

Thank you very much,
Gina
ChrisCharlton
Posts: 1354
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 10:34 am

Re: significance of random effects in cross-classified model

Post by ChrisCharlton »

As you are fitting a cross-classified model and refer to credible intervals I assume that you are using MCMC, in which case you would do the comparison using the DIC statistic (see chapter 2 of the MCMC guide: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/cmm/media/soft ... mc-web.pdf). The comparison would be between the model with or without the extra parameters, and a reduction in DIC value suggests a better model. If on the other hand you were using (R)IGLS with MLwiN then you would need to do a Wald test as MLwiN estimates binomial models using quasi-likelihood.
ginamartin
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 12:06 pm

Re: significance of random effects in cross-classified model

Post by ginamartin »

Thank you for your reply Chris!
Post Reply