Multiple membership or cross classified model?

Welcome to the forum for MLwiN users. Feel free to post your question about MLwiN software here. The Centre for Multilevel Modelling take no responsibility for the accuracy of these posts, we are unable to monitor them closely. Do go ahead and post your question and thank you in advance if you find the time to post any answers!

Remember to check out our extensive software FAQs which may answer your question: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/cmm/software/s ... port-faqs/
Post Reply
FloHarrison
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2013 4:19 pm

Multiple membership or cross classified model?

Post by FloHarrison »

Hi,

I'm constructing a model looking at children's physical activity. Children were measured on three occasions, in Years 5, 6 and 9. So for the first two measurement periods they were at primary schools, but had moved to secondary schools for measurement 3. I am modelling my outcome on a day-by-day basis, so have days nested within children nested within schools. On each day a child is only ever at one school.

Should I use a multiple membership model, which would allow for some weighting to be placed on primary school for measurements taken at the secondary school, or should I try a cross classified model, which I think would treat primary schools and secondary schools as separate units.

Thanks,

Flo Harrison
joneskel
Posts: 26
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2012 3:09 pm

Re: Multiple membership or cross classified model?

Post by joneskel »

Interesting question! There is some debate about the choice of models in the literature; I would recommend looking at

Alastair H Leyland and Øyvind Næss (2009) The effect of area of residence over the life course on subsequent mortality, J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc. 2009 June; 172(3): 555–578.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2008.00581.x

Leyland AH, Næss Ø. (200&) Multilevel modelling of the longitudinal influence of neighbourhoods on health [e-letter]. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health Online 2007:18 January open access
Post Reply