Hello,
I am comparing two models with a binary response variable with MCMC.
Model 1 is a single level model, model 2 is a two level models.
I understand that in this context, the DIC statistics should be used to compare models, and that the model with the lowest DIC is a better fit.
Is there a value for the difference in DICS that is used to consider that the difference between models is statistically significant (ie a value equivalent to p<0.05 in non-mcmc models)?
I know such "magical" values are somehow controversial, but they would be helpful to explain the results to readers that are not familiar with MCMC.
Thank you .
Manuel
DICs difference when comparing models after MCMC
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2021 5:54 pm
-
- Posts: 1384
- Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 10:34 am
Re: DICs difference when comparing models after MCMC
Bill gives some guidance on slide 57 of a workshop presentation that he gave some years ago, available at:
https://www.ukdataservice.ac.uk/media/3 ... ation4.pdf
The MRC Biostatistics unit, who originally developed the BUGS software, also give some suggestions:
https://www.mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk/software/ ... ct-dic/#q9
https://www.ukdataservice.ac.uk/media/3 ... ation4.pdf
The MRC Biostatistics unit, who originally developed the BUGS software, also give some suggestions:
https://www.mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk/software/ ... ct-dic/#q9
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2021 5:54 pm
Re: DICs difference when comparing models after MCMC
Thank you, very useful!