Power Analysis: Rules of Thumb
Posted: Sun Nov 07, 2021 8:54 pm
I found it very interesting and helpful as I read about rules-of-thumb to determine the appropriate sample size for conducting a multilevel analysis on MLWin. The link I refer to: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/cmm/learning/m ... mples.html
These hints, however, only relate to level 2 units and motivated me to ask how you would evaluate my current sample size. In particular, I have unbalanced panel-data: 128 individuals (level 2) and 326 observations (level 1) which are measured at three waves. This indicates that I have 2.5 observations per individual. Does this - in your opinion and based on your experience - relate to a reasonable statistical power of e.g. 0.8?
My goal is related to getting non-zero results on the basis of a within-between random effects specification with Bayesian analysis. Furthermore, I plan to conduct my first-time retrospective power analysis via MLpowsim.
Best,
Sabine
These hints, however, only relate to level 2 units and motivated me to ask how you would evaluate my current sample size. In particular, I have unbalanced panel-data: 128 individuals (level 2) and 326 observations (level 1) which are measured at three waves. This indicates that I have 2.5 observations per individual. Does this - in your opinion and based on your experience - relate to a reasonable statistical power of e.g. 0.8?
My goal is related to getting non-zero results on the basis of a within-between random effects specification with Bayesian analysis. Furthermore, I plan to conduct my first-time retrospective power analysis via MLpowsim.
Best,
Sabine