Power Analysis: Rules of Thumb

Welcome to the forum for MLwiN users. Feel free to post your question about MLwiN software here. The Centre for Multilevel Modelling take no responsibility for the accuracy of these posts, we are unable to monitor them closely. Do go ahead and post your question and thank you in advance if you find the time to post any answers!

Remember to check out our extensive software FAQs which may answer your question: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/cmm/software/s ... port-faqs/
Post Reply
SabineKatzdobler
Posts: 23
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2020 10:22 am

Power Analysis: Rules of Thumb

Post by SabineKatzdobler »

I found it very interesting and helpful as I read about rules-of-thumb to determine the appropriate sample size for conducting a multilevel analysis on MLWin. The link I refer to: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/cmm/learning/m ... mples.html

These hints, however, only relate to level 2 units and motivated me to ask how you would evaluate my current sample size. In particular, I have unbalanced panel-data: 128 individuals (level 2) and 326 observations (level 1) which are measured at three waves. This indicates that I have 2.5 observations per individual. Does this - in your opinion and based on your experience - relate to a reasonable statistical power of e.g. 0.8?

My goal is related to getting non-zero results on the basis of a within-between random effects specification with Bayesian analysis. Furthermore, I plan to conduct my first-time retrospective power analysis via MLpowsim.

Best,

Sabine
billb
Posts: 157
Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 1:21 pm

Re: Power Analysis: Rules of Thumb

Post by billb »

Hi Sabine,
That is really hard to say without knowing what you are hoping to test. Statistical power links to a test and will depend on what that test is and what effect size you are looking for / degree of clustering etc. There should be details in MLPowSim that will help.
Best wishes,
Bill.
Post Reply