Search found 4 matches
- Tue Mar 15, 2011 7:13 am
- Forum: MLwiN user forum
- Topic: Hi everyone!
- Replies: 2
- Views: 10966
Re: Hi everyone!
oh yeah! thanks for checking. i got it. it's already in MLwin FAQs.
- Sun Jan 23, 2011 6:17 am
- Forum: MLwiN user forum
- Topic: The over all variation explained by the model
- Replies: 2
- Views: 10871
Re: The over all variation explained by the model
Tnx Bosawas for the reply!
oh yeah! it gives a DIC result when MCMC is used but nothing when IGLS is used. As a coincidence, am not using MCMC, that's why i asked. but am also eager to know more on Model-fit-Goodness in MLwin.
bye!
oh yeah! it gives a DIC result when MCMC is used but nothing when IGLS is used. As a coincidence, am not using MCMC, that's why i asked. but am also eager to know more on Model-fit-Goodness in MLwin.
bye!
- Sat Dec 25, 2010 5:53 am
- Forum: MLwiN user forum
- Topic: The over all variation explained by the model
- Replies: 2
- Views: 10871
The over all variation explained by the model
Hi guys!
Last time i posted a question regarding the Goodness-of-fit of the model when IGLS is used but didn't get any reply on it. While i was referring to Snijders and Bosker, i read the R-square equivalent of the multilevel analysis in binary response model. The idea put there is: say if you ...
Last time i posted a question regarding the Goodness-of-fit of the model when IGLS is used but didn't get any reply on it. While i was referring to Snijders and Bosker, i read the R-square equivalent of the multilevel analysis in binary response model. The idea put there is: say if you ...
- Wed Dec 22, 2010 7:21 am
- Forum: MLwiN user forum
- Topic: Hi everyone!
- Replies: 2
- Views: 10966
Hi everyone!
I was trying to fit a 2-level logistic regression using MLwin but i faced some challenges and almost stuck. My question is: when i fit the model by using the default IGLS it only gives me out the estimates of the coefficients and the level 1 and level 2 residual variances but nothing that shows the ...