wrong notaton for multiple membership models

Welcome to the forum for MLwiN users. Feel free to post your question about MLwiN software here. The Centre for Multilevel Modelling take no responsibility for the accuracy of these posts, we are unable to monitor them closely. Do go ahead and post your question and thank you in advance if you find the time to post any answers!

Remember to check out our extensive software FAQs which may answer your question: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/cmm/software/s ... port-faqs/
Post Reply
ClaudiaSchuchart
Posts: 5
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2013 6:20 pm

wrong notaton for multiple membership models

Post by ClaudiaSchuchart »

baseline model.docx
(199.75 KiB) Downloaded 531 times
I have specified my model as a three-level multiple membership model (occasions, students, schools). The data are cross classified at level 3 (schools). Schools could be changed at 5 points in time.
However, the equation window does not show that my response variable (mathe) is modelled as a weighted sum of school effects. In fact, it does not differ from the notation for the simple baseline IGLS-model. What am I doing wrong? I attach the screen shot of the equation winow and the data structure (i = time, j = idaluni, k = s1, cons = ausw).
Many thanks in advance!
Claudia
ChrisCharlton
Posts: 1384
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 10:34 am

Re: wrong notaton for multiple membership models

Post by ChrisCharlton »

I suspect that you need to change the notation to the single subscript version as described in chapter 16 of the MCMC manual. To do this click on the notation button and remove the tick for multiple subscripts.
Post Reply