Hello,
I'm wondering if there is a benchmark figure regarding the appropriateness of running a Multiple Membership model.
I'm analysing a dataset of patients nested within hospitals and around 2% of patients are "members" of multiple hospitals - does this figure of 2% justify running a multiple membership model?
Thanks
Valerie
Multiple membership
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 432
- Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2011 2:14 pm
Re: Multiple membership
Hi Valerie,
Good question, I am not aware of any studies relating the percentage of multiple membership to parameter biases.
Clearly, the more mobility, the less appropriate a naive hierarchical model and the more appropriate a multiple membership model.
However, with only 2% of patients belonging to 2 hospitals I think that the naive hierarchical model will be an adequate approximation in your study.
Put another way, the naive 2-level model is appropriate for 98% of your sample, which sounds fine!
Best wishes
George
Good question, I am not aware of any studies relating the percentage of multiple membership to parameter biases.
Clearly, the more mobility, the less appropriate a naive hierarchical model and the more appropriate a multiple membership model.
However, with only 2% of patients belonging to 2 hospitals I think that the naive hierarchical model will be an adequate approximation in your study.
Put another way, the naive 2-level model is appropriate for 98% of your sample, which sounds fine!
Best wishes
George
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 3:09 pm
Re: Multiple membership
Hi George,
Many thanks for your response - this is very useful!
Best regards,
Valerie
Many thanks for your response - this is very useful!
Best regards,
Valerie