Multiple membership

Welcome to the forum for runmlwin users. Feel free to post your question about runmlwin here. The Centre for Multilevel Modelling take no responsibility for the accuracy of these posts, we are unable to monitor them closely. Do go ahead and post your question and thank you in advance if you find the time to post any answers!

Go to runmlwin: Running MLwiN from within Stata >> http://www.bristol.ac.uk/cmm/software/runmlwin/
Post Reply
VBMHealthEcon
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 3:09 pm

Multiple membership

Post by VBMHealthEcon »

Hello,

I'm wondering if there is a benchmark figure regarding the appropriateness of running a Multiple Membership model.

I'm analysing a dataset of patients nested within hospitals and around 2% of patients are "members" of multiple hospitals - does this figure of 2% justify running a multiple membership model?

Thanks
Valerie
GeorgeLeckie
Site Admin
Posts: 432
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2011 2:14 pm

Re: Multiple membership

Post by GeorgeLeckie »

Hi Valerie,

Good question, I am not aware of any studies relating the percentage of multiple membership to parameter biases.
Clearly, the more mobility, the less appropriate a naive hierarchical model and the more appropriate a multiple membership model.
However, with only 2% of patients belonging to 2 hospitals I think that the naive hierarchical model will be an adequate approximation in your study.
Put another way, the naive 2-level model is appropriate for 98% of your sample, which sounds fine!

Best wishes

George
VBMHealthEcon
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 3:09 pm

Re: Multiple membership

Post by VBMHealthEcon »

Hi George,

Many thanks for your response - this is very useful!

Best regards,
Valerie
Post Reply